She is never sexually attracted to a man whom she perceives as merely equal to her. She is attracted to the degree that she perceives him to be superior — in some way that she can get fired up about. Equality, thus, defines the 0 point on her scale of attraction.
What kind of male superiority can she get fired up about? That depends on her particular preferences, predicaments, and values. Psychosocial dominance most often does the trick. Intellectual or artistic dominance can do the trick in a domain that defines her own life. Physical superiority is rarely a strong factor because it matters less in modern life and because many men have it.
July 25, 2010 at 12:00 am |
Exactly.
July 25, 2010 at 12:10 am |
are you back poetry or is it pd on the keyboard (nice last post)?
July 25, 2010 at 1:22 am |
I’m back and healed. Well, mostly healed. Healed enough to type with *both* hands, which is exciting. I’m hoping to bug PD to occasionally guest post from me from time to time, once he’s not so busy. He is an amazing writer, I’ll pass on your compliments.
August 1, 2010 at 10:24 am |
[...] Stagetwo – “Equality: The 0 on the Scale of Female-to-Male Sexual Attraction” [...]